Pyyan / Compare / Arize AI vs LiteLLM vs Requesty

Arize AI vs LiteLLM vs Requesty

3 of 5

Routers & Gateways · verified 13 Aug 2026

×AArize AIArizecurrent
×BLiteLLMBerriAIcurrent
×RequestyRequestycurrent
2 slots left
SpecificationArize AILiteLLMRequesty
SummaryML-grade rigour on the routing layer.The self-hosted standard.Lowest measured overhead.
Added latencyLowSelf-hosted8ms P50
HostingManagedSelfManaged
CachingRedis
CategoryRouters & GatewaysRouters & GatewaysRouters & Gateways
OfficialArizeBerriAIRequesty

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Arize AI

ML-grade rigour on the routing layer.

Best for evaluation.

Full spec sheet →

LiteLLM

  • Budget controls and Redis caching
  • Zero marginal cost, you run it

Best for production.

Full spec sheet →

Requesty

Lowest measured overhead.

Best for latency-critical.

Full spec sheet →