Pyyan / Compare / CAC vs EU AI Office vs UK AI Security Institute vs CAISI vs Intl. Network for AI Measurement

CAC vs EU AI Office vs UK AI Security Institute vs CAISI vs Intl. Network for AI Measurement

5 of 5

Regulators · verified 13 Aug 2026

×CACChinacurrent
×EEU AI OfficeEuropean Commissioncurrent
×UUK AI Security InstituteUnited Kingdomcurrent
×CAISIUnited Statescurrent
×MIntl. Network for AI MeasurementMultilateralcurrent
SpecificationCACEU AI OfficeUK AI Security InstituteCAISIIntl. Network for AI Measurement
SummaryCyberspace Administration of China.First hard enforcement regime for AI.Frontier model pre-deployment testing.Center for AI Standards and Innovation.Ten-member evaluation consortium.
JurisdictionChinaEuropean UnionUnited KingdomUnited StatesMultilateral
InstrumentCybersecurity LawEU AI ActSectoralNIST AI RMFShared evaluations
Enforcing since1 Jan 20262 Aug 2026202420242024
CategoryRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulators
OfficialChinaEuropean CommissionUnited KingdomUnited StatesMultilateral

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

CAC

  • AI security review and data localisation
  • Fines and suspensions issued without published reasoning

Full spec sheet →

EU AI Office

  • Enforcement began 2 August 2026
  • High-risk obligations live the same day
  • EU evaluation capacity expected 2027

Best for .

Full spec sheet →

UK AI Security Institute

  • Outcome-based, pro-innovation model
  • No single UK AI act

Full spec sheet →

CAISI

  • Renamed from the US AI Safety Institute
  • No federal AI law — state patchwork

Full spec sheet →

Intl. Network for AI Measurement

  • Renamed from the Network of AI Safety Institutes
  • Australia, Canada, EU, France, Japan, Kenya, Korea, Singapore, UK, US

Full spec sheet →