Pyyan / Compare / CAC vs EU AI Office vs UK AI Security Institute vs Intl. Network for AI Measurement
CAC vs EU AI Office vs UK AI Security Institute vs Intl. Network for AI Measurement
4 of 5Regulators · verified 13 Aug 2026
| Specification | CAC | EU AI Office | UK AI Security Institute | Intl. Network for AI Measurement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary | Cyberspace Administration of China. | First hard enforcement regime for AI. | Frontier model pre-deployment testing. | Ten-member evaluation consortium. |
| Jurisdiction | China | European Union | United Kingdom | Multilateral |
| Instrument | Cybersecurity Law | EU AI Act | Sectoral | Shared evaluations |
| Enforcing since | 1 Jan 2026 | 2 Aug 2026 | 2024 | 2024 |
| Category | Regulators | Regulators | Regulators | Regulators |
| Official | China ↗ | European Commission ↗ | United Kingdom ↗ | Multilateral ↗ |
Highlighted rows are where these differ.
CAC
- AI security review and data localisation
- Fines and suspensions issued without published reasoning
EU AI Office
- Enforcement began 2 August 2026
- High-risk obligations live the same day
- EU evaluation capacity expected 2027
Best for —.
Intl. Network for AI Measurement
- Renamed from the Network of AI Safety Institutes
- Australia, Canada, EU, France, Japan, Kenya, Korea, Singapore, UK, US