Pyyan / Compare / Claude Cowork vs Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor vs Devin

Claude Cowork vs Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor vs Devin

5 of 5

Agentic Tools · verified 13 Aug 2026

×Claude CoworkAnthropiccurrent
×Claude CodeAnthropiccurrent
×CodexOpenAIcurrent
×CursorCursorcurrent
×DevinCognitioncurrent
SpecificationClaude CoworkClaude CodeCodexCursorDevin
SummaryKnowledge-work agent for business users.Terminal agent with per-subagent model control.Holds the Terminal-Bench record.Market leader for day-to-day development.Ticket in, pull request out.
SurfaceWebCLI + IDE + webCLI + cloudIDECloud
Pricefrom $20/mo$20/mofrom $20/mo
SubagentsYesNo
CategoryAgentic ToolsAgentic ToolsAgentic ToolsAgentic ToolsAgentic Tools
OfficialAnthropicAnthropicOpenAICursorCognition

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Claude Cowork

  • Excel, PowerPoint, Word and PDF output

Best for documents.

Full spec sheet →

Claude Code

  • Built as an agent, not an assistant
  • Discovers and reads files unprompted
  • Strongest on multi-file reasoning

Best for autonomous work.

Full spec sheet →

Codex

  • Asynchronous and cloud-isolated
  • No subagent support

Best for async cloud runs.

Full spec sheet →

Cursor

  • VS Code foundation
  • ~$9B valuation

Best for daily driver.

Full spec sheet →

Devin

  • The only real bet on hands-off autonomy

Best for delegation.

Full spec sheet →