Pyyan / Compare / Claude Cowork vs Claude Code vs Codex vs Dots

Claude Cowork vs Claude Code vs Codex vs Dots

4 of 5

Agentic Tools · verified 1 Oct 2026

×Claude CoworkAnthropiccurrent
×Claude CodeAnthropiccurrent
×CodexOpenAIcurrent
×DotsOpenAIcurrent
1 slot left
SpecificationClaude CoworkClaude CodeCodexDots
SummaryKnowledge-work agent for business users.Terminal agent with per-subagent model control.Holds the Terminal-Bench record.An agent with its own computer, still running after you close the tab.
SurfaceWebCLI + IDE + webCLI + cloudChatGPT + Slack + Teams
Pricefrom $20/mo——from $100/mo
Subagents—YesNoYes
CategoryAgentic ToolsAgentic ToolsAgentic ToolsAgentic Tools
OfficialAnthropic ↗Anthropic ↗OpenAI ↗OpenAI ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Claude Cowork

  • Excel, PowerPoint, Word and PDF output

Best for documents.

Full spec sheet →

Claude Code

  • Built as an agent, not an assistant
  • Discovers and reads files unprompted
  • Strongest on multi-file reasoning

Best for autonomous work.

Full spec sheet →

Codex

  • Asynchronous and cloud-isolated
  • No subagent support

Best for async cloud runs.

Full spec sheet →

Dots

  • Each dot gets its own cloud computer and browser, on GPT-6 Astra
  • Reaches the 4,000 or so apps already connected to ChatGPT, and delegates to sub-agents
  • Nothing on Free, Go or Plus, and not for Pro users in the EEA, Switzerland or the UK

Best for work that continues without you.

Full spec sheet →