Pyyan / Compare / Claude Cowork vs Claude Code vs Codex vs Dots vs Cursor

Claude Cowork vs Claude Code vs Codex vs Dots vs Cursor

5 of 5

Agentic Tools · verified 1 Oct 2026

×Claude CoworkAnthropiccurrent
×Claude CodeAnthropiccurrent
×CodexOpenAIcurrent
×DotsOpenAIcurrent
×CursorCursorcurrent
SpecificationClaude CoworkClaude CodeCodexDotsCursor
SummaryKnowledge-work agent for business users.Terminal agent with per-subagent model control.Holds the Terminal-Bench record.An agent with its own computer, still running after you close the tab.Market leader for day-to-day development.
SurfaceWebCLI + IDE + webCLI + cloudChatGPT + Slack + TeamsIDE
Pricefrom $20/mo——from $100/mo$20/mo
Subagents—YesNoYes—
CategoryAgentic ToolsAgentic ToolsAgentic ToolsAgentic ToolsAgentic Tools
OfficialAnthropic ↗Anthropic ↗OpenAI ↗OpenAI ↗Cursor ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Claude Cowork

  • Excel, PowerPoint, Word and PDF output

Best for documents.

Full spec sheet →

Claude Code

  • Built as an agent, not an assistant
  • Discovers and reads files unprompted
  • Strongest on multi-file reasoning

Best for autonomous work.

Full spec sheet →

Codex

  • Asynchronous and cloud-isolated
  • No subagent support

Best for async cloud runs.

Full spec sheet →

Dots

  • Each dot gets its own cloud computer and browser, on GPT-6 Astra
  • Reaches the 4,000 or so apps already connected to ChatGPT, and delegates to sub-agents
  • Nothing on Free, Go or Plus, and not for Pro users in the EEA, Switzerland or the UK

Best for work that continues without you.

Full spec sheet →

Cursor

  • VS Code foundation
  • Owned by SpaceX since 14 August 2026, an all-stock deal valued at $60bn

Best for daily driver.

Full spec sheet →