Pyyan / Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon

2 of 5

Language Models · verified 20 Oct 2026

Claude Fable 5.1Anthropiccurrent
Gemini 4 ArgonGooglecurrent
3 slots left
SpecificationClaude Fable 5.1Gemini 4 Argon
SummarySame price as Fable 5, and cache reads cost a quarter of what they did.First on one independent board, fifth on another, and cheap until December.
Context1M1M
Input ($/Mtok)$10$2
Output ($/Mtok)$50$10
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Max output128K262K
ParametersNot publishedNot published
Released1 Sep 202630 Sep 2026, GA 13 Oct
Model IDclaude-fable-5-1gemini-4-argon
CategoryLanguage ModelsLanguage Models
Official—Google ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Claude Fable 5.1

  • Matches or beats Fable 5 at low and medium effort, and pulls clear at high effort
  • Cache reads cut to 25% of the old price, so re-reading a long context got much cheaper
  • Identical model to Mythos 5.1 underneath; the difference is the safeguards

Best for coding and long-running work.

Full spec sheet →

Gemini 4 Argon

  • The price doubles to $4 and $20 on 1 December, and cached input is discounted 95%
  • First of 41 on the Vals Index at 68.90%, but 52.6 on Artificial Analysis against 57.6 for Opus 5.5
  • 77.9 on DeepSWE v1.1 in Google's table, and 55.0 on FrontierSWE v2 where GPT-6 Astra scores 65.5

Best for frontier work while the introductory rate lasts.

Full spec sheet →