Pyyan / Compare / Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
2 of 5Language Models · verified 10 Oct 2026
Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropiccurrent
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAIcurrent| Specification | Claude Haiku 5.5 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Summary | A tenth of Haiku 4.5's price, and it finishes terminal tasks Haiku 4.5 could not start. | Astra's score on DeepSWE, at a fifth of Astra's cost. |
| Context | Not published | 1.05M |
| Input ($/Mtok) | $0.1 | $2 |
| Output ($/Mtok) | $0.5 | $10 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Max output | Not published | 128K |
| Parameters | Not published | Not published |
| Released | 7 Oct 2026 | 29 Sep 2026 |
| Model ID | claude-haiku-5-5 | gpt-6.1-sol |
| Category | Language Models | Language Models |
| Official | Anthropic ↗ | OpenAI ↗ |
Highlighted rows are where these differ.
Claude Haiku 5.5
- 39.2% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, where Haiku 4.5 scored 0.0%
- Above 100K tokens the price rises to $0.50 and $2.50, for the whole request
- First Haiku with an adjustable effort setting, and a new tokenizer that spends slightly more tokens
Best for high volume work at the bottom of the stack.
GPT-6.1 Sol
- Matches GPT-6 Astra on DeepSWE v1.1 at roughly a fifth of the cost
- $5.47 per Terminal-Bench Science task against $23.80 for Astra
- Above 272K tokens a prompt bills at 2x input and 1.5x output for the whole request
Best for coding and agent work at volume.