PyyanThe AI Index

Pyyan / Compare / Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5

2 of 5

Language Models · verified 29 Sept 2026

Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropiccurrent
Claude Fable 5Anthropiccurrent
3 slots left
SpecificationClaude Sonnet 5.5Claude Fable 5
SummaryAbove Opus 5.5 on Terminal-Bench, at half the input price.Most capable widely released model, for the hardest reasoning and long-horizon agentic work.
Context1M1M
Input ($/Mtok)$2$10
Output ($/Mtok)$10$50
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Max output128K128K
ParametersNot published—
Released28 Sep 2026—
Model IDclaude-sonnet-5-5claude-fable-5
CategoryLanguage ModelsLanguage Models
OfficialAnthropic ↗Anthropic ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

  • 70.6% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, against 66.4% for Opus 5.5 six days earlier
  • 1844 on GDPval-AA, level with Opus 5.5's 1846
  • More than 30% faster than Sonnet 5, and Anthropic says up to 30% less per task on tokens

Best for agentic coding at volume.

Full spec sheet →

Claude Fable 5

  • Thinking is always on — the `thinking` param is rejected
  • Raw chain of thought is never returned
  • Requires 30-day data retention; unavailable under ZDR

Best for the hardest problems.

Full spec sheet →