Pyyan / Compare / Codex vs Claude Code vs Dots vs Cursor vs Devin

Codex vs Claude Code vs Dots vs Cursor vs Devin

5 of 5

Agentic Tools · verified 1 Oct 2026

×CodexOpenAIcurrent
×Claude CodeAnthropiccurrent
×DotsOpenAIcurrent
×CursorCursorcurrent
×DevinCognitioncurrent
SpecificationCodexClaude CodeDotsCursorDevin
SummaryHolds the Terminal-Bench record.Terminal agent with per-subagent model control.An agent with its own computer, still running after you close the tab.Market leader for day-to-day development.Ticket in, pull request out.
SurfaceCLI + cloudCLI + IDE + webChatGPT + Slack + TeamsIDECloud
Price——from $100/mo$20/mofrom $20/mo
SubagentsNoYesYes——
CategoryAgentic ToolsAgentic ToolsAgentic ToolsAgentic ToolsAgentic Tools
OfficialOpenAI ↗Anthropic ↗OpenAI ↗Cursor ↗Cognition ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Codex

  • Asynchronous and cloud-isolated
  • No subagent support

Best for async cloud runs.

Full spec sheet →

Claude Code

  • Built as an agent, not an assistant
  • Discovers and reads files unprompted
  • Strongest on multi-file reasoning

Best for autonomous work.

Full spec sheet →

Dots

  • Each dot gets its own cloud computer and browser, on GPT-6 Astra
  • Reaches the 4,000 or so apps already connected to ChatGPT, and delegates to sub-agents
  • Nothing on Free, Go or Plus, and not for Pro users in the EEA, Switzerland or the UK

Best for work that continues without you.

Full spec sheet →

Cursor

  • VS Code foundation
  • Owned by SpaceX since 14 August 2026, an all-stock deal valued at $60bn

Best for daily driver.

Full spec sheet →

Devin

  • The only real bet on hands-off autonomy

Best for delegation.

Full spec sheet →