Pyyan / Compare / Codex vs Dots vs Cursor

Codex vs Dots vs Cursor

3 of 5

Agentic Tools · verified 1 Oct 2026

×CodexOpenAIcurrent
×DotsOpenAIcurrent
×CursorCursorcurrent
2 slots left
SpecificationCodexDotsCursor
SummaryHolds the Terminal-Bench record.An agent with its own computer, still running after you close the tab.Market leader for day-to-day development.
SurfaceCLI + cloudChatGPT + Slack + TeamsIDE
Price—from $100/mo$20/mo
SubagentsNoYes—
CategoryAgentic ToolsAgentic ToolsAgentic Tools
OfficialOpenAI ↗OpenAI ↗Cursor ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Codex

  • Asynchronous and cloud-isolated
  • No subagent support

Best for async cloud runs.

Full spec sheet →

Dots

  • Each dot gets its own cloud computer and browser, on GPT-6 Astra
  • Reaches the 4,000 or so apps already connected to ChatGPT, and delegates to sub-agents
  • Nothing on Free, Go or Plus, and not for Pro users in the EEA, Switzerland or the UK

Best for work that continues without you.

Full spec sheet →

Cursor

  • VS Code foundation
  • Owned by SpaceX since 14 August 2026, an all-stock deal valued at $60bn

Best for daily driver.

Full spec sheet →