Pyyan / Compare / CoreWeave vs RunPod vs Lambda vs Modal vs Vast.ai

CoreWeave vs RunPod vs Lambda vs Modal vs Vast.ai

5 of 5

GPU Clouds · verified 13 Aug 2026

×CoreWeaveCoreWeavecurrent
×RunPodRunPodcurrent
×LambdaLambda Labscurrent
×ModalModalcurrent
×Vast.aiVast.aicurrent
SpecificationCoreWeaveRunPodLambdaModalVast.ai
SummaryLarge-scale training with capacity guarantees.Best serverless and pay-per-request.Best availability for production inference.Code-first serverless, no idle cost.Cheapest spot rates, no guarantees.
H100 ($/hr)$—$2.34$3.99
B200 ($/hr)$5.5$5.98$3.49
ServerlessNoYesNoYesNo
SLAYesYesYesYesNo
CategoryGPU CloudsGPU CloudsGPU CloudsGPU CloudsGPU Clouds
OfficialCoreWeaveRunPodLambda LabsModalVast.ai

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

CoreWeave

  • HGX B200 hardware
  • Reserved annual pricing

Best for 70B+ training.

Full spec sheet →

RunPod

  • 81% cheaper than AWS for H100
  • Serverless endpoints, scale to zero

Best for variable traffic.

Full spec sheet →

Lambda

  • Cheapest B200 on-demand
  • Capacity generally available

Best for steady production.

Full spec sheet →

Modal

  • Define the environment in Python

Best for bursty inference.

Full spec sheet →

Vast.ai

  • No SLA, no security guarantees, no compliance
  • Peer-to-peer marketplace

Best for fault-tolerant batch.

Full spec sheet →