Pyyan / Compare / EU AI Office vs UK AI Security Institute vs CAISI vs CAC

EU AI Office vs UK AI Security Institute vs CAISI vs CAC

4 of 5

Regulators · verified 13 Aug 2026

×EEU AI OfficeEuropean Commissioncurrent
×UUK AI Security InstituteUnited Kingdomcurrent
×CAISIUnited Statescurrent
×CACChinacurrent
1 slot left
SpecificationEU AI OfficeUK AI Security InstituteCAISICAC
SummaryFirst hard enforcement regime for AI.Frontier model pre-deployment testing.Center for AI Standards and Innovation.Cyberspace Administration of China.
JurisdictionEuropean UnionUnited KingdomUnited StatesChina
InstrumentEU AI ActSectoralNIST AI RMFCybersecurity Law
Enforcing since2 Aug 2026202420241 Jan 2026
CategoryRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulators
OfficialEuropean Commission ↗United Kingdom ↗United States ↗China ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

EU AI Office

  • Enforcement began 2 August 2026
  • High-risk obligations live the same day
  • EU evaluation capacity expected 2027

Best for —.

Full spec sheet →

UK AI Security Institute

  • Outcome-based, pro-innovation model
  • No single UK AI act

Full spec sheet →

CAISI

  • Renamed from the US AI Safety Institute
  • No federal AI law — state patchwork

Full spec sheet →

CAC

  • AI security review and data localisation
  • Fines and suspensions issued without published reasoning

Full spec sheet →