Pyyan / Compare / EU AI Office vs UK AI Security Institute vs CAISI vs CAC vs Intl. Network for AI Measurement

EU AI Office vs UK AI Security Institute vs CAISI vs CAC vs Intl. Network for AI Measurement

5 of 5

Regulators · verified 13 Aug 2026

×EEU AI OfficeEuropean Commissioncurrent
×UUK AI Security InstituteUnited Kingdomcurrent
×CAISIUnited Statescurrent
×CACChinacurrent
×MIntl. Network for AI MeasurementMultilateralcurrent
SpecificationEU AI OfficeUK AI Security InstituteCAISICACIntl. Network for AI Measurement
SummaryFirst hard enforcement regime for AI.Frontier model pre-deployment testing.Center for AI Standards and Innovation.Cyberspace Administration of China.Ten-member evaluation consortium.
JurisdictionEuropean UnionUnited KingdomUnited StatesChinaMultilateral
InstrumentEU AI ActSectoralNIST AI RMFCybersecurity LawShared evaluations
Enforcing since2 Aug 2026202420241 Jan 20262024
CategoryRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulators
OfficialEuropean CommissionUnited KingdomUnited StatesChinaMultilateral

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

EU AI Office

  • Enforcement began 2 August 2026
  • High-risk obligations live the same day
  • EU evaluation capacity expected 2027

Best for .

Full spec sheet →

UK AI Security Institute

  • Outcome-based, pro-innovation model
  • No single UK AI act

Full spec sheet →

CAISI

  • Renamed from the US AI Safety Institute
  • No federal AI law — state patchwork

Full spec sheet →

CAC

  • AI security review and data localisation
  • Fines and suspensions issued without published reasoning

Full spec sheet →

Intl. Network for AI Measurement

  • Renamed from the Network of AI Safety Institutes
  • Australia, Canada, EU, France, Japan, Kenya, Korea, Singapore, UK, US

Full spec sheet →