PyyanThe AI Index

Pyyan / Compare / Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5

2 of 5

Language Models · verified 13 Aug 2026

Gemini 3.1 ProGooglecurrent
Claude Opus 5Anthropiccurrent
3 slots left
SpecificationGemini 3.1 ProClaude Opus 5
SummaryBest for very large multimodal context.Complex agentic coding and enterprise work at half the cost of Fable 5.
Context1M1M
Input ($/Mtok)—$5
Output ($/Mtok)—$25
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Max output—128K
Released—24 Jul 2026
Model ID—claude-opus-5
CategoryLanguage ModelsLanguage Models
OfficialGoogle ↗Anthropic ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

  • Reads an hour of video in one pass
  • Strongest multimodal grounding

Best for long documents.

Full spec sheet →

Claude Opus 5

  • Thinking on by default — a step change over Opus 4.8
  • 512-token prompt-cache minimum, down from 1024
  • Separate rate-limit bucket from the Opus 4.x pool

Best for agentic coding.

Full spec sheet →