Pyyan / Compare / Groq LPU vs B200 vs MI400 vs Ascend 950DT

Groq LPU vs B200 vs MI400 vs Ascend 950DT

4 of 5

GPU & AI Chips · verified 24 Sept 2026

×Groq LPUGroqcurrent
×B200NVIDIAcurrent
×MI400AMDcurrent
×HAscend 950DTHuaweicurrent
1 slot left
SpecificationGroq LPUB200MI400Ascend 950DT
SummaryInference only, ~18× GPU speed.The current volume Blackwell part.Double NVIDIA's memory capacity.144GB on Huawei's own HBM, and the part China is building gigawatts around.
Memory—192GB HBM3e432GB HBM4144GB HiZQ 2.0
Bandwidth——19.6 TB/s4 TB/s
Price—$30–50K—Above ¥250,000 (about $37K), reported
VendorGroqNVIDIAAMDHuawei
CategoryGPU & AI ChipsGPU & AI ChipsGPU & AI ChipsGPU & AI Chips
OfficialGroq ↗NVIDIA ↗AMD ↗Huawei ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Groq LPU

  • No training capability

Best for low-latency serving.

Full spec sheet →

B200

  • Sold out through mid-2026
  • ~3.6M unit backlog

Best for general training.

Full spec sheet →

MI400

  • 19.6 TB/s bandwidth
  • 40 PFLOPS FP4
  • $7.2B in commitments

Best for large-model inference.

Full spec sheet →

Ascend 950DT

  • 4 TB/s memory bandwidth and a 2 TB/s interconnect, 2.5x the Ascend 910C
  • HiZQ 2.0 is Huawei's own memory standard rather than a licensed HBM3 or HBM3e part
  • Indicated price rose 20% to 50% in two months to September 2026, on a memory shortage
  • Successor Ascend 960DT pulled forward to Q1 2027, Huawei said on 17 September

Best for serving models where Nvidia cannot be bought.

Full spec sheet →