Pyyan / Compare / Groq LPU vs B300 Blackwell Ultra vs MI400 vs Ascend 950DT

Groq LPU vs B300 Blackwell Ultra vs MI400 vs Ascend 950DT

4 of 5

GPU & AI Chips · verified 24 Sept 2026

×Groq LPUGroqcurrent
×B300 Blackwell UltraNVIDIAcurrent
×MI400AMDcurrent
×HAscend 950DTHuaweicurrent
1 slot left
SpecificationGroq LPUB300 Blackwell UltraMI400Ascend 950DT
SummaryInference only, ~18× GPU speed.15 PFLOPS dense FP4.Double NVIDIA's memory capacity.144GB on Huawei's own HBM, and the part China is building gigawatts around.
Memory—288GB HBM3e432GB HBM4144GB HiZQ 2.0
Bandwidth—8 TB/s19.6 TB/s4 TB/s
Price—~$40–50K (verify)—Above ¥250,000 (about $37K), reported
VendorGroqNVIDIAAMDHuawei
CategoryGPU & AI ChipsGPU & AI ChipsGPU & AI ChipsGPU & AI Chips
OfficialGroq ↗NVIDIA ↗AMD ↗Huawei ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Groq LPU

  • No training capability

Best for low-latency serving.

Full spec sheet →

B300 Blackwell Ultra

  • 8 TB/s memory bandwidth
  • Per-GPU pricing widely misquoted — one source cites rack pricing

Best for frontier training.

Full spec sheet →

MI400

  • 19.6 TB/s bandwidth
  • 40 PFLOPS FP4
  • $7.2B in commitments

Best for large-model inference.

Full spec sheet →

Ascend 950DT

  • 4 TB/s memory bandwidth and a 2 TB/s interconnect, 2.5x the Ascend 910C
  • HiZQ 2.0 is Huawei's own memory standard rather than a licensed HBM3 or HBM3e part
  • Indicated price rose 20% to 50% in two months to September 2026, on a memory shortage
  • Successor Ascend 960DT pulled forward to Q1 2027, Huawei said on 17 September

Best for serving models where Nvidia cannot be bought.

Full spec sheet →