Pyyan / Compare / Haystack vs LlamaIndex vs LangChain & LangGraph vs RAGFlow
Haystack vs LlamaIndex vs LangChain & LangGraph vs RAGFlow
4 of 5RAG & Knowledge Graphs · verified 13 Aug 2026
×LangChain & LangGraphLangChaincurrent
| Specification | Haystack | LlamaIndex | LangChain & LangGraph | RAGFlow |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary | A strict pipeline abstraction, built for regulated work. | The strongest option for document-centric retrieval. | Orchestration, with retrieval as one piece. | Visual pipeline builder, deep document understanding. |
| Kind | Framework | Framework | Framework | Platform |
| Graph | Via integrations | Yes, property graph index | Via integrations | Yes |
| Language | Python | Python, TypeScript | Python, TypeScript | Python |
| Licence | Apache 2.0 | MIT | MIT | Apache 2.0 |
| GitHub stars | ~20k | ~45k | ~120k | ~35k |
| Category | RAG & Knowledge Graphs | RAG & Knowledge Graphs | RAG & Knowledge Graphs | RAG & Knowledge Graphs |
| Official | deepset ↗ | LlamaIndex ↗ | LangChain ↗ | InfiniFlow ↗ |
Highlighted rows are where these differ.
Haystack
- Every step is declared, which is what audits need
- Cleanest option where a wrong answer has consequences
Best for finance, health, legal and government.
LlamaIndex
- Deep document handling and many indexing strategies
- The common advice is LlamaIndex for retrieval, LangGraph for orchestration
Best for PDFs, knowledge bases, structured data.
LangChain & LangGraph
- LangGraph adds durable state and checkpointing
- Widely used, and widely argued about
Best for agents that retrieve as one step among many.
RAGFlow
- Strong document parsing built in
- The usual entry point for non-developers
Best for teams without a Python engineer.