Pyyan / Compare / Intl. Network for AI Measurement vs EU AI Office vs CAISI vs CAC
Intl. Network for AI Measurement vs EU AI Office vs CAISI vs CAC
4 of 5Regulators · verified 13 Aug 2026
| Specification | Intl. Network for AI Measurement | EU AI Office | CAISI | CAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary | Ten-member evaluation consortium. | First hard enforcement regime for AI. | Center for AI Standards and Innovation. | Cyberspace Administration of China. |
| Jurisdiction | Multilateral | European Union | United States | China |
| Instrument | Shared evaluations | EU AI Act | NIST AI RMF | Cybersecurity Law |
| Enforcing since | 2024 | 2 Aug 2026 | 2024 | 1 Jan 2026 |
| Category | Regulators | Regulators | Regulators | Regulators |
| Official | Multilateral ↗ | European Commission ↗ | United States ↗ | China ↗ |
Highlighted rows are where these differ.
Intl. Network for AI Measurement
- Renamed from the Network of AI Safety Institutes
- Australia, Canada, EU, France, Japan, Kenya, Korea, Singapore, UK, US
EU AI Office
- Enforcement began 2 August 2026
- High-risk obligations live the same day
- EU evaluation capacity expected 2027
Best for —.
CAC
- AI security review and data localisation
- Fines and suspensions issued without published reasoning