Pyyan / Compare / Intl. Network for AI Measurement vs EU AI Office vs UK AI Security Institute vs CAC
Intl. Network for AI Measurement vs EU AI Office vs UK AI Security Institute vs CAC
4 of 5Regulators · verified 13 Aug 2026
| Specification | Intl. Network for AI Measurement | EU AI Office | UK AI Security Institute | CAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary | Ten-member evaluation consortium. | First hard enforcement regime for AI. | Frontier model pre-deployment testing. | Cyberspace Administration of China. |
| Jurisdiction | Multilateral | European Union | United Kingdom | China |
| Instrument | Shared evaluations | EU AI Act | Sectoral | Cybersecurity Law |
| Enforcing since | 2024 | 2 Aug 2026 | 2024 | 1 Jan 2026 |
| Category | Regulators | Regulators | Regulators | Regulators |
| Official | Multilateral ↗ | European Commission ↗ | United Kingdom ↗ | China ↗ |
Highlighted rows are where these differ.
Intl. Network for AI Measurement
- Renamed from the Network of AI Safety Institutes
- Australia, Canada, EU, France, Japan, Kenya, Korea, Singapore, UK, US
EU AI Office
- Enforcement began 2 August 2026
- High-risk obligations live the same day
- EU evaluation capacity expected 2027
Best for —.
CAC
- AI security review and data localisation
- Fines and suspensions issued without published reasoning