Pyyan / Compare / Intl. Network for AI Measurement vs EU AI Office vs UK AI Security Institute vs CAISI

Intl. Network for AI Measurement vs EU AI Office vs UK AI Security Institute vs CAISI

4 of 5

Regulators · verified 13 Aug 2026

×MIntl. Network for AI MeasurementMultilateralcurrent
×EEU AI OfficeEuropean Commissioncurrent
×UUK AI Security InstituteUnited Kingdomcurrent
×CAISIUnited Statescurrent
1 slot left
SpecificationIntl. Network for AI MeasurementEU AI OfficeUK AI Security InstituteCAISI
SummaryTen-member evaluation consortium.First hard enforcement regime for AI.Frontier model pre-deployment testing.Center for AI Standards and Innovation.
JurisdictionMultilateralEuropean UnionUnited KingdomUnited States
InstrumentShared evaluationsEU AI ActSectoralNIST AI RMF
Enforcing since20242 Aug 202620242024
CategoryRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulators
OfficialMultilateralEuropean CommissionUnited KingdomUnited States

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Intl. Network for AI Measurement

  • Renamed from the Network of AI Safety Institutes
  • Australia, Canada, EU, France, Japan, Kenya, Korea, Singapore, UK, US

Full spec sheet →

EU AI Office

  • Enforcement began 2 August 2026
  • High-risk obligations live the same day
  • EU evaluation capacity expected 2027

Best for .

Full spec sheet →

UK AI Security Institute

  • Outcome-based, pro-innovation model
  • No single UK AI act

Full spec sheet →

CAISI

  • Renamed from the US AI Safety Institute
  • No federal AI law — state patchwork

Full spec sheet →