Pyyan / Compare / Intl. Network for AI Measurement vs EU AI Office vs UK AI Security Institute vs CAISI vs CAC

Intl. Network for AI Measurement vs EU AI Office vs UK AI Security Institute vs CAISI vs CAC

5 of 5

Regulators · verified 13 Aug 2026

×MIntl. Network for AI MeasurementMultilateralcurrent
×EEU AI OfficeEuropean Commissioncurrent
×UUK AI Security InstituteUnited Kingdomcurrent
×CAISIUnited Statescurrent
×CACChinacurrent
SpecificationIntl. Network for AI MeasurementEU AI OfficeUK AI Security InstituteCAISICAC
SummaryTen-member evaluation consortium.First hard enforcement regime for AI.Frontier model pre-deployment testing.Center for AI Standards and Innovation.Cyberspace Administration of China.
JurisdictionMultilateralEuropean UnionUnited KingdomUnited StatesChina
InstrumentShared evaluationsEU AI ActSectoralNIST AI RMFCybersecurity Law
Enforcing since20242 Aug 2026202420241 Jan 2026
CategoryRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulators
OfficialMultilateralEuropean CommissionUnited KingdomUnited StatesChina

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Intl. Network for AI Measurement

  • Renamed from the Network of AI Safety Institutes
  • Australia, Canada, EU, France, Japan, Kenya, Korea, Singapore, UK, US

Full spec sheet →

EU AI Office

  • Enforcement began 2 August 2026
  • High-risk obligations live the same day
  • EU evaluation capacity expected 2027

Best for .

Full spec sheet →

UK AI Security Institute

  • Outcome-based, pro-innovation model
  • No single UK AI act

Full spec sheet →

CAISI

  • Renamed from the US AI Safety Institute
  • No federal AI law — state patchwork

Full spec sheet →

CAC

  • AI security review and data localisation
  • Fines and suspensions issued without published reasoning

Full spec sheet →