Pyyan / Compare / Kong AI Gateway vs OpenRouter vs Requesty

Kong AI Gateway vs OpenRouter vs Requesty

3 of 5

Routers & Gateways · verified 13 Aug 2026

×Kong AI GatewayKongcurrent
×OpenRouterOpenRoutercurrent
×RequestyRequestycurrent
2 slots left
SpecificationKong AI GatewayOpenRouterRequesty
SummaryOnly sensible if you already run Kong.Biggest catalogue, simplest start.Lowest measured overhead.
Added latencyVaries40–55ms8ms P50
HostingSelfManagedManaged
CategoryRouters & GatewaysRouters & GatewaysRouters & Gateways
OfficialKongOpenRouterRequesty

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Kong AI Gateway

  • Plugin ecosystem was built for REST, not LLMs
  • No token-level cost attribution

Best for existing Kong users.

Full spec sheet →

OpenRouter

  • Consolidated billing across every provider
  • 40–55ms overhead — 5× the alternatives

Best for prototyping.

Full spec sheet →

Requesty

Lowest measured overhead.

Best for latency-critical.

Full spec sheet →