PyyanThe AI Index

Pyyan / Compare / Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Llama 4 Maverick vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

2 of 5

Open-Weight Models · verified 13 Sept 2026

Llama 4 MaverickMetacurrent
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekcurrent
3 slots left
SpecificationLlama 4 MaverickDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
SummaryThe Western open-weight default.Twice the parameters of the Flash it replaces, and cheaper to run.
Context—1M
Input ($/Mtok)—$0.3
Output ($/Mtok)—$1.2
LicenceLlama licenceMIT
Max output—256K
Parameters—552B total, 8B / 16B active
Released—10 Sep 2026
Model ID—deepseek-flash
CategoryOpen-Weight ModelsOpen-Weight Models
OfficialMeta ↗DeepSeek ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Llama 4 Maverick

The Western open-weight default.

Best for Western vendor.

Full spec sheet →

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

  • 552B total, 8B active while reading the prompt and 16B while generating, with a 1M token context
  • DeepSeek says it beats V4-Pro; V4-Pro requests route to it from 14 September 2026
  • MIT licence, native image input, and a KV cache about a quarter the size of V4-Flash's

Best for cheap agentic coding with images.

Full spec sheet →