Pyyan / Compare / MGX vs Thrive Capital vs Andreessen Horowitz vs NVIDIA / NVentures
MGX vs Thrive Capital vs Andreessen Horowitz vs NVIDIA / NVentures
4 of 5Investors · verified 13 Aug 2026
×NVIDIA / NVenturesUnited Statescurrent
| Specification | MGX | Thrive Capital | Andreessen Horowitz | NVIDIA / NVentures |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary | One of the biggest single-sector funds ever raised. | Most consequential AI investor of the past 18 months. | Capital to lead any round. | Strategic capital at unprecedented scale. |
| Type | Sovereign | Venture | Venture | Corporate |
| Fund size | $49B | — | $90B AUM | — |
| Notable | OpenAI, Anthropic | OpenAI, Databricks | — | OpenAI |
| Category | Investors | Investors | Investors | Investors |
| Official | Abu Dhabi ↗ | United States ↗ | United States ↗ | United States ↗ |
Highlighted rows are where these differ.
MGX
- Closed July 2026, above its $45B target
- 14 companies across semis, infra and platforms
Best for infrastructure scale.
Thrive Capital
- Led OpenAI $6.6B, Perplexity $500M, Databricks $10B
Best for mega-rounds.
Andreessen Horowitz
- $4.2B dedicated AI and infrastructure fund
Best for competitive rounds.
NVIDIA / NVentures
- Part of OpenAI's $122B March 2026 round
- The line between strategic and venture has dissolved
Best for strategic alignment.