PyyanThe AI Index

Pyyan / Compare / Milvus vs pgvector vs Qdrant

Milvus vs pgvector vs Qdrant

3 of 5

Vector Databases · verified 13 Aug 2026

×MilvusZillizcurrent
×pgvectorPostgreSQLcurrent
×QdrantQdrantcurrent
2 slots left
SpecificationMilvuspgvectorQdrant
SummaryBuilt for billions of vectors.Vectors inside the database you already run.The fastest of the purpose-built stores.
IndexHNSW, IVF, DiskANN, GPUHNSW, IVFFlatHNSW
Hybrid searchYesYes, with SQLYes
HostingSelf-host and managedSelf-host or any managed PostgresSelf-host and managed
LicenceApache 2.0PostgreSQLApache 2.0
p50 latency~10ms~15ms4ms
CategoryVector DatabasesVector DatabasesVector Databases
OfficialZilliz ↗PostgreSQL ↗Qdrant ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Milvus

  • Distributed architecture with GPU index support
  • Heavier to operate than the alternatives

Best for very large corpora.

Full spec sheet →

pgvector

  • One database for vectors, rows and joins
  • The honest default: reach for something else only when this stops working

Best for almost everyone, until scale says otherwise.

Full spec sheet →

Qdrant

  • Written in Rust; 10 to 25% faster than Weaviate or Milvus on common workloads
  • Strong filtering alongside vector search
  • Self-host or managed, same engine

Best for latency-sensitive retrieval.

Full spec sheet →