Pyyan / Compare / Muse Glimmer vs DeepSeek V4-Pro

Muse Glimmer vs DeepSeek V4-Pro

2 of 5

Open-Weight Models · verified 13 Sept 2026

Muse GlimmerMetacurrent
DeepSeek V4-ProDeepSeekcurrent
3 slots left
SpecificationMuse GlimmerDeepSeek V4-Pro
SummaryMeta's open one. 29.6B dense, Apache 2.0, no published price.Best all-round open model of 2026.
Context131K—
Input ($/Mtok)Weights only—
Output ($/Mtok)Weights only—
LicenceApache 2.0MIT
Max output16K—
Parameters29.6B dense—
Released10 Aug 2026—
Model IDmeta/muse-glimmer—
CategoryOpen-Weight ModelsOpen-Weight Models
Official—DeepSeek ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Muse Glimmer

  • 29.6B dense parameters under Apache 2.0
  • 131K native context
  • The open counterpart to Muse Spark 1.2, which is proprietary

Best for a permissive Meta model.

Full spec sheet →

DeepSeek V4-Pro

  • Tops open leaderboards on agentic coding and reasoning
  • MIT licence — no conditions
  • Pioneered aggressive cache-hit pricing at ~$0.07/M
  • DeepSeek routes all V4-Pro requests to V4.1 Flash from 14 September 2026

Best for everything open.

Full spec sheet →