Pyyan / Compare / Not Diamond vs LiteLLM vs Requesty

Not Diamond vs LiteLLM vs Requesty

3 of 5

Routers & Gateways · verified 13 Aug 2026

×Not DiamondNot Diamondcurrent
×BLiteLLMBerriAIcurrent
×RequestyRequestycurrent
2 slots left
SpecificationNot DiamondLiteLLMRequesty
SummaryPicks the model per request, not per config.The self-hosted standard.Lowest measured overhead.
Added latencyLowSelf-hosted8ms P50
HostingManagedSelfManaged
CachingRedis
CategoryRouters & GatewaysRouters & GatewaysRouters & Gateways
OfficialNot DiamondBerriAIRequesty

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Not Diamond

  • Routes by predicted quality and cost
  • No manual model selection

Best for cost/quality tuning.

Full spec sheet →

LiteLLM

  • Budget controls and Redis caching
  • Zero marginal cost, you run it

Best for production.

Full spec sheet →

Requesty

Lowest measured overhead.

Best for latency-critical.

Full spec sheet →