Pyyan / Compare / Dots vs Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor

Dots vs Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor

4 of 5

Agentic Tools · verified 1 Oct 2026

×DotsOpenAIcurrent
×Claude CodeAnthropiccurrent
×CodexOpenAIcurrent
×CursorCursorcurrent
1 slot left
SpecificationDotsClaude CodeCodexCursor
SummaryAn agent with its own computer, still running after you close the tab.Terminal agent with per-subagent model control.Holds the Terminal-Bench record.Market leader for day-to-day development.
SurfaceChatGPT + Slack + TeamsCLI + IDE + webCLI + cloudIDE
Pricefrom $100/mo——$20/mo
SubagentsYesYesNo—
CategoryAgentic ToolsAgentic ToolsAgentic ToolsAgentic Tools
OfficialOpenAI ↗Anthropic ↗OpenAI ↗Cursor ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Dots

  • Each dot gets its own cloud computer and browser, on GPT-6 Astra
  • Reaches the 4,000 or so apps already connected to ChatGPT, and delegates to sub-agents
  • Nothing on Free, Go or Plus, and not for Pro users in the EEA, Switzerland or the UK

Best for work that continues without you.

Full spec sheet →

Claude Code

  • Built as an agent, not an assistant
  • Discovers and reads files unprompted
  • Strongest on multi-file reasoning

Best for autonomous work.

Full spec sheet →

Codex

  • Asynchronous and cloud-isolated
  • No subagent support

Best for async cloud runs.

Full spec sheet →

Cursor

  • VS Code foundation
  • Owned by SpaceX since 14 August 2026, an all-stock deal valued at $60bn

Best for daily driver.

Full spec sheet →