Pyyan / Compare / OpenRouter vs LiteLLM vs Requesty

OpenRouter vs LiteLLM vs Requesty

3 of 5

Routers & Gateways · verified 13 Aug 2026

×OpenRouterOpenRoutercurrent
×BLiteLLMBerriAIcurrent
×RequestyRequestycurrent
2 slots left
SpecificationOpenRouterLiteLLMRequesty
SummaryBiggest catalogue, simplest start.The self-hosted standard.Lowest measured overhead.
Added latency40–55msSelf-hosted8ms P50
HostingManagedSelfManaged
CachingRedis
CategoryRouters & GatewaysRouters & GatewaysRouters & Gateways
OfficialOpenRouterBerriAIRequesty

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

OpenRouter

  • Consolidated billing across every provider
  • 40–55ms overhead — 5× the alternatives

Best for prototyping.

Full spec sheet →

LiteLLM

  • Budget controls and Redis caching
  • Zero marginal cost, you run it

Best for production.

Full spec sheet →

Requesty

Lowest measured overhead.

Best for latency-critical.

Full spec sheet →