Pyyan / Compare / Qdrant vs pgvector vs Pinecone vs Milvus vs Weaviate

Qdrant vs pgvector vs Pinecone vs Milvus vs Weaviate

5 of 5

Vector Databases · verified 13 Aug 2026

×QdrantQdrantcurrent
×pgvectorPostgreSQLcurrent
×PineconePineconecurrent
×MilvusZillizcurrent
×WeaviateWeaviatecurrent
SpecificationQdrantpgvectorPineconeMilvusWeaviate
SummaryThe fastest of the purpose-built stores.Vectors inside the database you already run.Managed, and the smoothest to operate.Built for billions of vectors.Hybrid search with batteries included.
IndexHNSWHNSW, IVFFlatProprietaryHNSW, IVF, DiskANN, GPUHNSW
Hybrid searchYesYes, with SQLYesYesYes, native
HostingSelf-host and managedSelf-host or any managed PostgresManaged onlySelf-host and managedSelf-host and managed
LicenceApache 2.0PostgreSQLProprietaryApache 2.0BSD-3
p50 latency4ms~15ms<10ms~10ms~12ms
CategoryVector DatabasesVector DatabasesVector DatabasesVector DatabasesVector Databases
OfficialQdrantPostgreSQLPineconeZillizWeaviate

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Qdrant

  • Written in Rust; 10 to 25% faster than Weaviate or Milvus on common workloads
  • Strong filtering alongside vector search
  • Self-host or managed, same engine

Best for latency-sensitive retrieval.

Full spec sheet →

pgvector

  • One database for vectors, rows and joins
  • The honest default: reach for something else only when this stops working

Best for almost everyone, until scale says otherwise.

Full spec sheet →

Pinecone

  • Sub-10ms p50 with nothing to maintain
  • Costs draw scrutiny at scale; Notion moved away and cut spend ~60%

Best for teams who do not want to run a database.

Full spec sheet →

Milvus

  • Distributed architecture with GPU index support
  • Heavier to operate than the alternatives

Best for very large corpora.

Full spec sheet →

Weaviate

  • Vector, BM25 and metadata filters in one query
  • Modules for embedding generation built in

Best for hybrid keyword and semantic search.

Full spec sheet →