Pyyan / Compare / Qdrant vs pgvector vs Pinecone vs Milvus vs Weaviate
Vector Databases · verified 13 Aug 2026
| Specification | Qdrant | pgvector | Pinecone | Milvus | Weaviate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary | The fastest of the purpose-built stores. | Vectors inside the database you already run. | Managed, and the smoothest to operate. | Built for billions of vectors. | Hybrid search with batteries included. |
| Index | HNSW | HNSW, IVFFlat | Proprietary | HNSW, IVF, DiskANN, GPU | HNSW |
| Hybrid search | Yes | Yes, with SQL | Yes | Yes | Yes, native |
| Hosting | Self-host and managed | Self-host or any managed Postgres | Managed only | Self-host and managed | Self-host and managed |
| Licence | Apache 2.0 | PostgreSQL | Proprietary | Apache 2.0 | BSD-3 |
| p50 latency | 4ms | ~15ms | <10ms | ~10ms | ~12ms |
| Category | Vector Databases | Vector Databases | Vector Databases | Vector Databases | Vector Databases |
| Official | Qdrant ↗ | PostgreSQL ↗ | Pinecone ↗ | Zilliz ↗ | Weaviate ↗ |
Highlighted rows are where these differ.
Best for latency-sensitive retrieval.
Best for almost everyone, until scale says otherwise.
Best for teams who do not want to run a database.
Best for very large corpora.
Best for hybrid keyword and semantic search.