Pyyan / Compare / TPU v7 Ironwood vs MI400 vs Ascend 950DT

TPU v7 Ironwood vs MI400 vs Ascend 950DT

3 of 5

GPU & AI Chips · verified 24 Sept 2026

×TPU v7 IronwoodGooglecurrent
×MI400AMDcurrent
×HAscend 950DTHuaweicurrent
2 slots left
SpecificationTPU v7 IronwoodMI400Ascend 950DT
SummaryInference-oriented, Google Cloud only.Double NVIDIA's memory capacity.144GB on Huawei's own HBM, and the part China is building gigawatts around.
Memory192GB HBM3e432GB HBM4144GB HiZQ 2.0
Bandwidth7.37 TB/s19.6 TB/s4 TB/s
Price——Above ¥250,000 (about $37K), reported
VendorGoogleAMDHuawei
CategoryGPU & AI ChipsGPU & AI ChipsGPU & AI Chips
OfficialGoogle ↗AMD ↗Huawei ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

TPU v7 Ironwood

  • Requires JAX
  • Not purchasable or on any marketplace

Best for GCP inference.

Full spec sheet →

MI400

  • 19.6 TB/s bandwidth
  • 40 PFLOPS FP4
  • $7.2B in commitments

Best for large-model inference.

Full spec sheet →

Ascend 950DT

  • 4 TB/s memory bandwidth and a 2 TB/s interconnect, 2.5x the Ascend 910C
  • HiZQ 2.0 is Huawei's own memory standard rather than a licensed HBM3 or HBM3e part
  • Indicated price rose 20% to 50% in two months to September 2026, on a memory shortage
  • Successor Ascend 960DT pulled forward to Q1 2027, Huawei said on 17 September

Best for serving models where Nvidia cannot be bought.

Full spec sheet →