Pyyan / Compare / TrueFoundry vs LiteLLM vs Portkey
TrueFoundry vs LiteLLM vs Portkey
3 of 5Routers & Gateways · verified 13 Aug 2026
| Specification | TrueFoundry | LiteLLM | Portkey |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summary | Enterprise gateway with full governance. | The self-hosted standard. | Routing plus guardrails and compliance. |
| Added latency | Low | Self-hosted | 8–20ms |
| Hosting | Both | Self | Both |
| Caching | — | Redis | Semantic |
| Category | Routers & Gateways | Routers & Gateways | Routers & Gateways |
| Official | TrueFoundry ↗ | BerriAI ↗ | Portkey ↗ |
Highlighted rows are where these differ.
TrueFoundry
- Centralised governance and cost tracking
- Self-hostable
Best for enterprise.
LiteLLM
- Budget controls and Redis caching
- Zero marginal cost, you run it
Best for production.
Portkey
- Best caching implementation
- Prompt management and audit trail
Best for regulated teams.