Pyyan / Compare / TrueFoundry vs LiteLLM vs Requesty

TrueFoundry vs LiteLLM vs Requesty

3 of 5

Routers & Gateways · verified 13 Aug 2026

×TrueFoundryTrueFoundrycurrent
×BLiteLLMBerriAIcurrent
×RequestyRequestycurrent
2 slots left
SpecificationTrueFoundryLiteLLMRequesty
SummaryEnterprise gateway with full governance.The self-hosted standard.Lowest measured overhead.
Added latencyLowSelf-hosted8ms P50
HostingBothSelfManaged
CachingRedis
CategoryRouters & GatewaysRouters & GatewaysRouters & Gateways
OfficialTrueFoundryBerriAIRequesty

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

TrueFoundry

  • Centralised governance and cost tracking
  • Self-hostable

Best for enterprise.

Full spec sheet →

LiteLLM

  • Budget controls and Redis caching
  • Zero marginal cost, you run it

Best for production.

Full spec sheet →

Requesty

Lowest measured overhead.

Best for latency-critical.

Full spec sheet →