Pyyan / Compare / UK AI Security Institute vs EU AI Office vs CAISI vs CAC vs Intl. Network for AI Measurement

UK AI Security Institute vs EU AI Office vs CAISI vs CAC vs Intl. Network for AI Measurement

5 of 5

Regulators · verified 13 Aug 2026

×UUK AI Security InstituteUnited Kingdomcurrent
×EEU AI OfficeEuropean Commissioncurrent
×CAISIUnited Statescurrent
×CACChinacurrent
×MIntl. Network for AI MeasurementMultilateralcurrent
SpecificationUK AI Security InstituteEU AI OfficeCAISICACIntl. Network for AI Measurement
SummaryFrontier model pre-deployment testing.First hard enforcement regime for AI.Center for AI Standards and Innovation.Cyberspace Administration of China.Ten-member evaluation consortium.
JurisdictionUnited KingdomEuropean UnionUnited StatesChinaMultilateral
InstrumentSectoralEU AI ActNIST AI RMFCybersecurity LawShared evaluations
Enforcing since20242 Aug 202620241 Jan 20262024
CategoryRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulators
OfficialUnited KingdomEuropean CommissionUnited StatesChinaMultilateral

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

UK AI Security Institute

  • Outcome-based, pro-innovation model
  • No single UK AI act

Full spec sheet →

EU AI Office

  • Enforcement began 2 August 2026
  • High-risk obligations live the same day
  • EU evaluation capacity expected 2027

Best for .

Full spec sheet →

CAISI

  • Renamed from the US AI Safety Institute
  • No federal AI law — state patchwork

Full spec sheet →

CAC

  • AI security review and data localisation
  • Fines and suspensions issued without published reasoning

Full spec sheet →

Intl. Network for AI Measurement

  • Renamed from the Network of AI Safety Institutes
  • Australia, Canada, EU, France, Japan, Kenya, Korea, Singapore, UK, US

Full spec sheet →