Pyyan / Compare / UK AI Security Institute vs EU AI Office vs CAISI vs Intl. Network for AI Measurement

UK AI Security Institute vs EU AI Office vs CAISI vs Intl. Network for AI Measurement

4 of 5

Regulators · verified 13 Aug 2026

×UUK AI Security InstituteUnited Kingdomcurrent
×EEU AI OfficeEuropean Commissioncurrent
×CAISIUnited Statescurrent
×MIntl. Network for AI MeasurementMultilateralcurrent
1 slot left
SpecificationUK AI Security InstituteEU AI OfficeCAISIIntl. Network for AI Measurement
SummaryFrontier model pre-deployment testing.First hard enforcement regime for AI.Center for AI Standards and Innovation.Ten-member evaluation consortium.
JurisdictionUnited KingdomEuropean UnionUnited StatesMultilateral
InstrumentSectoralEU AI ActNIST AI RMFShared evaluations
Enforcing since20242 Aug 202620242024
CategoryRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulatorsRegulators
OfficialUnited Kingdom ↗European Commission ↗United States ↗Multilateral ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

UK AI Security Institute

  • Outcome-based, pro-innovation model
  • No single UK AI act

Full spec sheet →

EU AI Office

  • Enforcement began 2 August 2026
  • High-risk obligations live the same day
  • EU evaluation capacity expected 2027

Best for —.

Full spec sheet →

CAISI

  • Renamed from the US AI Safety Institute
  • No federal AI law — state patchwork

Full spec sheet →

Intl. Network for AI Measurement

  • Renamed from the Network of AI Safety Institutes
  • Australia, Canada, EU, France, Japan, Kenya, Korea, Singapore, UK, US

Full spec sheet →