Pyyan / Compare / Weaviate vs pgvector vs Qdrant vs Pinecone vs Milvus
Vector Databases · verified 13 Aug 2026
| Specification | Weaviate | pgvector | Qdrant | Pinecone | Milvus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summary | Hybrid search with batteries included. | Vectors inside the database you already run. | The fastest of the purpose-built stores. | Managed, and the smoothest to operate. | Built for billions of vectors. |
| Index | HNSW | HNSW, IVFFlat | HNSW | Proprietary | HNSW, IVF, DiskANN, GPU |
| Hybrid search | Yes, native | Yes, with SQL | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Hosting | Self-host and managed | Self-host or any managed Postgres | Self-host and managed | Managed only | Self-host and managed |
| Licence | BSD-3 | PostgreSQL | Apache 2.0 | Proprietary | Apache 2.0 |
| p50 latency | ~12ms | ~15ms | 4ms | <10ms | ~10ms |
| Category | Vector Databases | Vector Databases | Vector Databases | Vector Databases | Vector Databases |
| Official | Weaviate ↗ | PostgreSQL ↗ | Qdrant ↗ | Pinecone ↗ | Zilliz ↗ |
Highlighted rows are where these differ.
Best for hybrid keyword and semantic search.
Best for almost everyone, until scale says otherwise.
Best for latency-sensitive retrieval.
Best for teams who do not want to run a database.
Best for very large corpora.