Pyyan / Compare / YOLO26 vs YOLOv12 vs RTMDet

YOLO26 vs YOLOv12 vs RTMDet

3 of 5

Object Detection · verified 13 Aug 2026

×YOLO26Ultralyticscurrent
×YOLOv12Ultralyticscurrent
×RTMDetOpenMMLabcurrent
2 slots left
SpecificationYOLO26YOLOv12RTMDet
SummaryThe latest in the line most people mean by object detection.Attention-centric YOLO, still widely deployed.Pure throughput, and an MIT licence.
COCO mAP~55~55~52
SpeedVery highVery high300+
LicenceAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0MIT
FamilySingle stageSingle stageSingle stage
Open vocabularyNoNoNo
Released202620252022
CategoryObject DetectionObject DetectionObject Detection
OfficialUltralyticsUltralyticsOpenMMLab

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

YOLO26

  • Strong on Jetson, Snapdragon and ARM CPUs
  • AGPL-3.0: open-source your derivative work or buy a licence

Best for edge and mobile deployment.

Full spec sheet →

YOLOv12

  • Attention added to the classic single-stage design
  • Same licensing consideration as YOLO26

Best for teams already on the YOLO toolchain.

Full spec sheet →

RTMDet

  • Wins on raw speed where accuracy is sufficient
  • MIT, so no derivative-work obligation

Best for high frame-rate video.

Full spec sheet →