Pyyan / Compare / Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5

2 of 5

Language Models · verified 24 Sept 2026

Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropiccurrent
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropiccurrent
3 slots left
SpecificationClaude Mythos 5.1Claude Opus 5.5
SummaryFable 5.1 with the safety classifiers removed. You cannot simply buy it.Fable 5.1's level of work on most tasks, at 40% less to run than Opus 5.
Context1M1M
Input ($/Mtok)$10$4
Output ($/Mtok)$50$20
LicenceProprietary, gatedProprietary
Max output128K128K
ParametersNot publishedNot published
Released1 Sep 202622 Sep 2026
Model IDclaude-mythos-5-1claude-opus-5-5
CategoryLanguage ModelsLanguage Models
Official—Anthropic ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Claude Mythos 5.1

  • The same underlying model as Fable 5.1, at a different safeguard level
  • US organisations and individuals in Anthropic's trusted access programmes only
  • Safety classifiers and high-risk fallbacks removed for Project Glasswing participants

Best for vetted frontier research.

Full spec sheet →

Claude Opus 5.5

  • 66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 52.3% for Opus 5, on Anthropic's own harness
  • Cache reads cut 60% to $0.20, and output more than 30% faster than Opus 5
  • Attempts to work around its boundaries 85% less often than Opus 5, Anthropic reports

Best for agentic coding at flagship quality.

Full spec sheet →