PyyanThe AI Index

Pyyan / Compare / Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5

2 of 5

Language Models · verified 24 Sept 2026

Claude Opus 5.5Anthropiccurrent
Claude Fable 5Anthropiccurrent
3 slots left
SpecificationClaude Opus 5.5Claude Fable 5
SummaryFable 5.1's level of work on most tasks, at 40% less to run than Opus 5.Most capable widely released model, for the hardest reasoning and long-horizon agentic work.
Context1M1M
Input ($/Mtok)$4$10
Output ($/Mtok)$20$50
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Max output128K128K
ParametersNot published—
Released22 Sep 2026—
Model IDclaude-opus-5-5claude-fable-5
CategoryLanguage ModelsLanguage Models
OfficialAnthropic ↗Anthropic ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Claude Opus 5.5

  • 66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 52.3% for Opus 5, on Anthropic's own harness
  • Cache reads cut 60% to $0.20, and output more than 30% faster than Opus 5
  • Attempts to work around its boundaries 85% less often than Opus 5, Anthropic reports

Best for agentic coding at flagship quality.

Full spec sheet →

Claude Fable 5

  • Thinking is always on — the `thinking` param is rejected
  • Raw chain of thought is never returned
  • Requires 30-day data retention; unavailable under ZDR

Best for the hardest problems.

Full spec sheet →