ERNIE 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5

Pyyan / Compare / ERNIE 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5

2 of 5

Language Models · verified 24 Sept 2026

ERNIE 5.1Baiducurrent

Claude Opus 5.5Anthropiccurrent

Add another3 slots left

Specification	ERNIE 5.1	Claude Opus 5.5
Summary	Baidu's closed frontier tier.	Fable 5.1's level of work on most tasks, at 40% less to run than Opus 5.
Context	—	1M
Input ($/Mtok)	—	$4
Output ($/Mtok)	—	$20
Licence	Proprietary	Proprietary
Max output	—	128K
Parameters	—	Not published
Released	8 May 2026	22 Sep 2026
Model ID	—	claude-opus-5-5
Category	Language Models	Language Models
Official	Baidu ↗	Anthropic ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Best for Chinese enterprise.

66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 52.3% for Opus 5, on Anthropic's own harness
Cache reads cut 60% to $0.20, and output more than 30% faster than Opus 5
Attempts to work around its boundaries 85% less often than Opus 5, Anthropic reports

Best for agentic coding at flagship quality.