Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5

Pyyan / Compare / Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5

2 of 5

Language Models · verified 24 Sept 2026

Gemini 3.1 ProGooglecurrent

Claude Opus 5.5Anthropiccurrent

Add another3 slots left

Specification	Gemini 3.1 Pro	Claude Opus 5.5
Summary	Best for very large multimodal context.	Fable 5.1's level of work on most tasks, at 40% less to run than Opus 5.
Context	1M	1M
Input ($/Mtok)	—	$4
Output ($/Mtok)	—	$20
Licence	Proprietary	Proprietary
Max output	—	128K
Parameters	—	Not published
Released	—	22 Sep 2026
Model ID	—	claude-opus-5-5
Category	Language Models	Language Models
Official	Google ↗	Anthropic ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Best for long documents.

66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 52.3% for Opus 5, on Anthropic's own harness
Cache reads cut 60% to $0.20, and output more than 30% faster than Opus 5
Attempts to work around its boundaries 85% less often than Opus 5, Anthropic reports

Best for agentic coding at flagship quality.