Pyyan / Compare / Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5

2 of 5

Language Models · verified 24 Sept 2026

Gemini 3.7 FlashGooglecurrent
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropiccurrent
3 slots left
SpecificationGemini 3.7 FlashClaude Opus 5.5
SummaryCheap now, twice the price on 1 January 2027. The rate is introductory.Fable 5.1's level of work on most tasks, at 40% less to run than Opus 5.
Context1M1M
Input ($/Mtok)$0.75$4
Output ($/Mtok)$3.75$20
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Max output64K128K
ParametersNot publishedNot published
Released13 Aug 202622 Sep 2026
Model IDgemini-3.7-flashclaude-opus-5-5
CategoryLanguage ModelsLanguage Models
Official—Anthropic ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

  • Introductory pricing of $0.75 in and $3.75 out per million tokens
  • Both rates double to $1.50 and $7.50 on 1 January 2027, which is worth budgeting for
  • Replaces 3.6 Flash as Google's volume tier

Best for high volume work.

Full spec sheet →

Claude Opus 5.5

  • 66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 52.3% for Opus 5, on Anthropic's own harness
  • Cache reads cut 60% to $0.20, and output more than 30% faster than Opus 5
  • Attempts to work around its boundaries 85% less often than Opus 5, Anthropic reports

Best for agentic coding at flagship quality.

Full spec sheet →