Pyyan / Compare / Gemini 3.8 Live vs Claude Opus 5.5

Gemini 3.8 Live vs Claude Opus 5.5

2 of 5

Language Models · verified 24 Sept 2026

Gemini 3.8 LiveGooglecurrent
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropiccurrent
3 slots left
SpecificationGemini 3.8 LiveClaude Opus 5.5
SummaryAudio in, audio out, and it keeps talking while it runs your tools.Fable 5.1's level of work on most tasks, at 40% less to run than Opus 5.
ContextNot published1M
Input ($/Mtok)$0.75$4
Output ($/Mtok)$4.5$20
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Max outputNot published128K
ParametersNot publishedNot published
Released15 Sep 202622 Sep 2026
Model IDgemini-3.8-liveclaude-opus-5-5
CategoryLanguage ModelsLanguage Models
OfficialGoogle ↗Anthropic ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Gemini 3.8 Live

  • Runs tools and API calls in the background while the conversation continues
  • 97 languages, detected and switched mid conversation
  • $3 per million audio tokens in and $12 out, or half a cent and 1.8 cents a minute

Best for real time voice agents.

Full spec sheet →

Claude Opus 5.5

  • 66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 52.3% for Opus 5, on Anthropic's own harness
  • Cache reads cut 60% to $0.20, and output more than 30% faster than Opus 5
  • Attempts to work around its boundaries 85% less often than Opus 5, Anthropic reports

Best for agentic coding at flagship quality.

Full spec sheet →