Pyyan / Compare / Grok 4.20 Reasoning vs Claude Opus 5.5

Grok 4.20 Reasoning vs Claude Opus 5.5

2 of 5

Language Models · verified 24 Sept 2026

Grok 4.20 ReasoningxAIcurrent
Claude Opus 5.5Anthropiccurrent
3 slots left
SpecificationGrok 4.20 ReasoningClaude Opus 5.5
SummaryAgentic reasoning SKU.Fable 5.1's level of work on most tasks, at 40% less to run than Opus 5.
Context1M1M
Input ($/Mtok)$1.25$4
Output ($/Mtok)$2.5$20
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Max output—128K
Parameters—Not published
Released—22 Sep 2026
Model IDgrok-4.20-0309-reasoningclaude-opus-5-5
CategoryLanguage ModelsLanguage Models
OfficialxAI ↗Anthropic ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Grok 4.20 Reasoning

Agentic reasoning SKU.

Best for multi-step agents.

Full spec sheet →

Claude Opus 5.5

  • 66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 52.3% for Opus 5, on Anthropic's own harness
  • Cache reads cut 60% to $0.20, and output more than 30% faster than Opus 5
  • Attempts to work around its boundaries 85% less often than Opus 5, Anthropic reports

Best for agentic coding at flagship quality.

Full spec sheet →