Grok Build 0.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5

Pyyan / Compare / Grok Build 0.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5

2 of 5

Language Models · verified 24 Sept 2026

Grok Build 0.1xAIcurrent

Claude Opus 5.5Anthropiccurrent

Add another3 slots left

Specification	Grok Build 0.1	Claude Opus 5.5
Summary	xAI's dedicated coding model.	Fable 5.1's level of work on most tasks, at 40% less to run than Opus 5.
Context	256K	1M
Input ($/Mtok)	$1	$4
Output ($/Mtok)	$2	$20
Licence	Proprietary	Proprietary
Max output	—	128K
Parameters	—	Not published
Released	29 May 2026	22 Sep 2026
Model ID	grok-build-0.1	claude-opus-5-5
Category	Language Models	Language Models
Official	xAI ↗	Anthropic ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

xAI's dedicated coding model.

Best for coding.

66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 52.3% for Opus 5, on Anthropic's own harness
Cache reads cut 60% to $0.20, and output more than 30% faster than Opus 5
Attempts to work around its boundaries 85% less often than Opus 5, Anthropic reports

Best for agentic coding at flagship quality.