Pyyan / Compare / Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Claude Opus 5.5
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B vs Claude Opus 5.5
2 of 5Language Models · verified 24 Sept 2026
Hy-MT2-30B-A3BTencentcurrentClaude Opus 5.5Anthropiccurrent
| Specification | Hy-MT2-30B-A3B | Claude Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Summary | A translation specialist across 33 language pairs, priced like nothing else. | Fable 5.1's level of work on most tasks, at 40% less to run than Opus 5. |
| Context | 8K | 1M |
| Input ($/Mtok) | $0.074 | $4 |
| Output ($/Mtok) | $0.295 | $20 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Max output | 8K | 128K |
| Parameters | Not published | Not published |
| Released | 20 Aug 2026 | 22 Sep 2026 |
| Model ID | hy-mt2-30b-a3b | claude-opus-5-5 |
| Category | Language Models | Language Models |
| Official | — | Anthropic ↗ |
Highlighted rows are where these differ.
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
- Tencent's translation flagship, covering 33 language pairs
- Seven cents per million input tokens, which is roughly a hundredth of a frontier model
- Short 8K context, because translation does not need more
Best for translation at volume.
Claude Opus 5.5
- 66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 52.3% for Opus 5, on Anthropic's own harness
- Cache reads cut 60% to $0.20, and output more than 30% faster than Opus 5
- Attempts to work around its boundaries 85% less often than Opus 5, Anthropic reports
Best for agentic coding at flagship quality.