PyyanThe AI Index

Pyyan / Compare / MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

2 of 5

Open-Weight Models · verified 29 Sept 2026

XMiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomicurrent
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeekcurrent
3 slots left
SpecificationMiMo-V2.6-FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
SummaryThe small one, and still multimodal.Twice the parameters of the Flash it replaces, and cheaper to run.
Context1M1M
Input ($/Mtok)Weights only$0.3
Output ($/Mtok)Weights only$1.2
LicenceMITMIT
Max outputNot published256K
Parameters309B total, 15B active552B total, 8B / 16B active
Released21 Sep 202610 Sep 2026
Model IDXiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.6-Flashdeepseek-flash
CategoryOpen-Weight ModelsOpen-Weight Models
OfficialXiaomi ↗DeepSeek ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • 309B total parameters, 15B active per token
  • Same 1M context and five layer speculative decoder as Pro
  • MIT licence, weights on Hugging Face

Best for multimodal work on your own cluster.

Full spec sheet →

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

  • 552B total, 8B active while reading the prompt and 16B while generating, with a 1M token context
  • DeepSeek says it beats V4-Pro; V4-Pro requests route to it from 14 September 2026
  • MIT licence, native image input, and a KV cache about a quarter the size of V4-Flash's

Best for cheap agentic coding with images.

Full spec sheet →