PyyanThe AI Index

Pyyan / Compare / Muse Glimmer vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Muse Glimmer vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

2 of 5

Open-Weight Models · verified 29 Sept 2026

Muse GlimmerMetacurrent
XMiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomicurrent
3 slots left
SpecificationMuse GlimmerMiMo-V2.6-Flash
SummaryMeta's open one. 29.6B dense, Apache 2.0, no published price.The small one, and still multimodal.
Context131K1M
Input ($/Mtok)Weights onlyWeights only
Output ($/Mtok)Weights onlyWeights only
LicenceApache 2.0MIT
Max output16KNot published
Parameters29.6B dense309B total, 15B active
Released10 Aug 202621 Sep 2026
Model IDmeta/muse-glimmerXiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.6-Flash
CategoryOpen-Weight ModelsOpen-Weight Models
Official—Xiaomi ↗

Highlighted rows are where these differ.

Muse Glimmer

  • 29.6B dense parameters under Apache 2.0
  • 131K native context
  • The open counterpart to Muse Spark 1.2, which is proprietary

Best for a permissive Meta model.

Full spec sheet →

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • 309B total parameters, 15B active per token
  • Same 1M context and five layer speculative decoder as Pro
  • MIT licence, weights on Hugging Face

Best for multimodal work on your own cluster.

Full spec sheet →